.
.
The Myth of Breeders' Ethics 
by Carolyn Hensley
.
Often in dog-related fields one hears or reads about "working 
to improve the breed". What this means to fanciers is that the 
breeder is working to produce a dog that most closely meets the
Breed Standard used in that breeder's country. One would think 
that a breeder's ultimate goal is to produce healthy, structurally 
sound, temperamentally stable dogs. Unfortunately, this may not
be true. Breeders focusing only on producing a certain morphology 
might ignore critical health and temperament issues, and breeding
for a structure which is popular in the show ring does not necessarily
produce a working athlete. In some sighthound breeds, this has
resulted in a dog that is ill-suited for life beyond a show ring. All
breeders have an agenda for breeding: it may be to produce quality
dogs and place them in caring homes, or it may be a scheme for self-
promotion within the fancier community. 
.
While the popular portrait of a breeder is someone who cares 
about the dogs brought into the world by his or her efforts and 
placing them in responsible homes, there is pressure on the 
ambitious breeder to keep producing more show-quality dogs. 
This can result in overbreeding, which triggers a cascade of 
disasters: poor quality facilities, poor socialization, poor health
assessment, poor care, and desperate schemes to get rid of the 
unwanted puppies. 
.
When searching for a dog the potential buyer must be aware that 
this is a "buyer beware" market. The breeder may or may not 
care about producing healthy, temperamentally stable dogs. The
breeder may or may not care about conducting business honestly. 
The consumer protection laws of each state and the local animal
control statutes remain the consumer's only protection if one deals
with an unscrupulous breeder. There is no other agent overseeing
the conduct and business practices of breeders.
.
Every national breed club has a Code of Ethics which outlines 
its ideal of responsible  breeding standards and a standard of 
conduct among its members. The quality and specificity of the 
code vary among the clubs, ranging from vague and elastic to
a precise checklist of actions. Due to the highly litigious nature 
of ethics violations, the Code of Ethics must function as an 
educational tool rather than an enforceable set of rules. 
National breed clubs and the American Kennel Club cannot 
police individual members. The best any breed club can do at 
this time is to educate and appeal to its members. The AKC 
may launch an investigation, but the basic scope of this is
confined to records violations. It does not involve itself in 
owner or contract disputes, and refers animal cruelty issues
to local law enforcement officials.
.
Do not assume that membership or status in a national breed 
club or any other dog-related organization is an assurance of 
ethical business conduct. 
.
Below you will find some popular claims made by breeders, 
and how to interpret them:
.
Legends: Some Impressive-Sounding Claims 
.
Breeder of Yourbreed for # years 
.
The implication here is that longevity is a measure of success. 
On the contrary, it is possible for a breeder to breed for decades, 
winning no respect from peers, and producing poor specimens. 
As long as there are buyers, the breeder keeps going. Using the 
Internet and magazines to advertise, the dogs can be sold sight
unseen, and it is a mess for the buyer to attempt to return the 
dog.  Selling to the uneducated public is very easy, especially
in rural areas. 
.
Home of # Champions
.
This interesting claim must be considered within the context of
population.  The best way to evaluate a claim like this is to 
examine the point system in dog shows for your regional area. 
If it requires many dogs to win a point, then there are other 
breeders and exhibitors in the area bringing their specimens to 
compete. In that case, a claim like this would be worthy of
respect. 
.
However, if there is only one breeder of Yourbreed in the area,
it is easy for the breeder to fill the Yourbreed ring with one's own 
dogs, thus building points for "big" wins. It is the exceptional 
judge who will withhold ribbons for poor quality. The norm is for
the judge to award the best example of that breed in the ring on
that given day. If poor and mediocre stock are all that is ever 
shown in an area, it is probable that poor and mediocre stock 
will win Championships. An AKC Championship is relative to
its competition. By itself the title means little.
.
A further consideration of conformational quality is to know
how many litters it took to produce the given number of 
Champions. Ten Champions out of three litters is impressive; 
but if it took ten litters to produce ten Champions, the quality 
of breeding is not as good.
.
Breeder and Trainer
.
Just as anyone can breed, anyone also can claim to be a 
trainer/handler.  There have been many laudable efforts to 
establish standards by responsible training organizations, but
there is no way to enforce these efforts. Books and resources
may prompt you at some point to consult a qualified trainer/handler. 
Good luck figuring out what that is. The training/hanlding
field is in a flux, and uniform standards do not exist. 
.
We've discussed the differences between a real Professional 
Handler and the part-time agent. We can again cover it if you
would like.:-))
.
Other then Champion titles:
.
The status of a Canine Good Citizen (CGC) evaluator falls into
the same category as the trainer. Many evaluators run classes,
then pass all class participants, whether the dogs are worthy of 
the Title or not.
.
An exception must be made for Competition Obedience, as rules
are very strict. If a breeder has put Obedience Titles on his or 
her dogs, especially Open or Utility Titles (CDX or UD), or has 
students who have achieved this, then you are dealing with a 
known (and high) standard. 
.
Home raised or Family raised
.
This means the dog or puppy is kept on the property, not 
necessarily in the house or in contact with people.  Remember, 
social contact and frequent handling are critical in the early 
developmental stages. Keeping the puppy in a pen in the barn 
or kennel is not preparing him to be a good companion.
.
"I can't afford to feed all these dogs. "
.
The responsible breeder only breeds after there is a demand for
puppies and prospective homes are lined up. The ethical breeder 
is prepared to make a firm financial commitment to the lives 
brought into the world from a breeding, and will insure that 
resources are available before breeding. The person who 
kind-heartedly assists a breeder desperate to place or euthanize
his or her dogs because of the sheer volume of breedings only 
perpetuates irresponsible, cruel behavior. A responsible breeder
does not need to appeal to organizations for rescue funds to
salvage puppies from his/her own breeding, with rare exceptions. 
(Here it is very important to distinguish between a single instance
and a pattern of behavior on the breeder's part.) 

Free of Hereditary Defects
.
Remember Biology 101? Scientists can only track what is known, 
not what is not known. It is mystifying that a breeder will 
make this claim about the breed when it cannot be a scientific 
truth. Health problems appear in the breed, and they may or do
have a genetic component. They include:  .
.
axonal neuropathy, a genetically-acquired, degenerative nerve disease 
.
deafness
.
hyper/hypothyroidism
.
seizures
.
impaired immune response or anaphylaxis: autoimmune disease,
food or contact allergies, vaccination and bee sting reactions
.
hip dysplasia & Legg Perthes
.
Von Willebrand's Disease, a blood-clotting disorder
.
eye problems
.
cardiomyopathy
.
Liver shunt
.
Most of these conditions are rare, but they are of concern, and 
certainly point to the need for the prospective Yourbreed owner
to learn as much as possible about different breeders and their
lines. 
.
To date, research for objective data on overall health problems 
of the breed has not been done. While there may be claims that
the many breeds are suffering from health problems in the 
United States, there is no scientific data to support or disprove
some of these charges. The genetic health of breeds remains a 
question until the parent breed club or some other responsible
party conducts the research that will provide objective,
scientifically verifiable conclusions.
.
The really great news is that there are fantastic, ethical breeders
breeding wonderful dogs. Be educated, be wise, and you will
find them!

 
.
To the Article page
.
To Main page
.
.
.
.
.